‹ directory
85MCP SCORE
B

Context7

https://mcp.context7.com/mcp
2 tools~1.2k tok/req100% annot.proto 2024-11-05
Raw JSON ›

Score by pillar

Security ·20100
Tool design ·18100
Schemas / desc ·1680
Reliability ·1480
Context-cost ·1281
Compliance ·1274
Coverage ·850

reliability: LOW (T1 single-shot, not credited - requires T3 >=24h)

Context-cost

1.2ktokens for tools/list

Paid on every request. Lean footprint for 2 tools.

ecosystem median ≈ 3k

MCP primitive coverage

the quality score covers tools
2
Tools
0
Resources · none
0
Prompts · none

Why this score — causal attribution

Each penalty: measure → mechanism → effect → Δscore.

Compliance · MEDIUM1.6

proto 2024-11-05 (4 rev. behind 2025-11-25)outdated protocol versionrecent features unavailable, recent clients weakened

Compliance · MEDIUM1.2

capability 'resources' declared but resources/list emptycapabilities inconsistent with real behaviorclients misled

Compliance · MEDIUM1.2

capability 'prompts' declared but prompts/list emptyinconsistent capabilitiesclients misled

Badge — paste it in your README

MCP Score badge — Context7[![MCP Score](https://checkmcp.dev/badge/mcp-context7-com.svg?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmcp.context7.com%2Fmcp)](https://checkmcp.dev/report?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmcp.context7.com%2Fmcp)

About Context7 — FAQ

Is the Context7 MCP server safe to use?+
CheckMCP audited Context7 and gave it an MCP Score of 85/100 (grade B) — good — only minor issues. The audit runs an OWASP MCP Top 10 security pass (tool poisoning, hardcoded secrets, command injection, the lethal trifecta) against the live endpoint; see the per-pillar breakdown and the "why this score" attribution on this page, and re-audit anytime at checkmcp.dev.
What is the MCP Score of Context7?+
Context7 scores 85/100 (grade B) on CheckMCP's vendor-neutral audit across six weighted pillars — security, tool design, schemas, context-cost, compliance and coverage — with reliability measured and shown but not yet credited.
How many tools does Context7 expose, and what is its context cost?+
Context7 exposes 2 tools, and its tools/list response costs roughly 1.2k tokens — paid on every request your agent makes to it. Lower is better for your context budget.
How was Context7 scored?+
By probing the live MCP endpoint (https://mcp.context7.com/mcp), inspecting its tools, schemas and protocol compliance, running an OWASP MCP Top 10 security pass, and measuring the token cost of tools/list — then attributing every penalty as measure → mechanism → effect. The methodology is open: checkmcp.dev/#methodology.